When the Nile River floods, all the farmers are temporarily out of work. Unrest and unemployment is 90% of the population. So the Kings created monuments out in the empty desert, away from the flood waters. This was busy-work for the people.
Khufu must have had millions of farm laborers; so he built the Great Pyramid at Giza. This monument took some time to build, and crime rates were low as a result. In later periods, crime rates and unemployment/unrest were high, leading to civil decline or corruption. The Middle Kingdom did this. The New Kingdom was focused on temple buildings and expanding the Empire. Ramses 3 had some unrest leading up to a coup; this followed Ramses 2 the Great, who built more temples than anyone, and who secured peace with the Hittites; Ramses 3 had military invasions as well. In the Late to Ptolemaic Periods, construction was less as Egypt was overtaken by foreigners. Romans saw Egypt as supplying their empire with grain, and some monuments were constructed.
The 19th Dynasty saw tomb building with Osiris as State Deity. The afterlife was popular as a diversion or escapism. After Rome fell, other invaders took control of Egypt, such as the Muslims, who built mosques near Cairo and Alexandria.
M7, 2012.
Horus KaNakht TutMoses Tutankhamon Son of Ra
The Haunted Pharaoh
Monday, January 23, 2012
Monday, January 16, 2012
2012
Nostradamus did not predict 2012 "end of the world" because he was Chronokinetic and wrote things that may influence Time, but has since reincarnated and changed that.
Prophets in a religious sense are a form of Priest.
They do not see the future and then write about it, because once people read it they want to change the prediction. Except for what happened to Henry the Second, anyway. Henry 2 tried to prevent his own death after Nostradamus told him how it would end, and the result was the same. Mohammad was a Priest, not one who predicted the future; however both Mohammad and Nostradamus are on (M7's) Record of Incarnations, as they both had Chronokinesis, not Clairvoyance.
This relates to Tutankhamon because of the prophecy in my novel, Eye of the Pharaoh, parts of which became real decades after written... The book was about Tutankhamon (1989 CE). Such as The Democracy Movement in the Middle East, Al Qaeda, the book's own publication, Iran's nuclear weapons program, etc.
M7, 2012.
Sunday, January 15, 2012
KV64 - not Ankhesenamon
http://news.yahoo.com/rare-tomb-woman-found-egypt-valley-kings-153839689.html
M7, 2012.
New Tomb KV64 of Musician from Karnak.
M7, 2012.
New Tomb KV64 of Musician from Karnak.
Friday, January 6, 2012
Osiris ritual tomb?
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?app=blog&blogid=2545&showentry=23248
Cenotaph of Osiris in Giza area.
M7, 2012.
I first mentioned this in my novel. Some people took this literally.
MC.
Cenotaph of Osiris in Giza area.
M7, 2012.
I first mentioned this in my novel. Some people took this literally.
MC.
Did Tutankhamon die in battle? A new theory...
Did Tutankhamon die in battle? Copyright 2012 MJC.
Tut waged war against the border lands of Nubia and Syria. He is shown on his battle chest campaigning against Syrians and Nubians, and later is collecting tribute (war taxes or plunder) from them. If the Hittites killed him in battle, why did they not claim Egypt as their conquered vassal? Remember: if a king dies in battle, the country is conquered. This was the case in ancient times, as with the battles of Alexander the Great vs. Persian Empire, etc.
Queen Ankhesenamon sent letters to the Hittite King offering to be a bride to his sons, and make them King of Egypt; his son is sent and is presumed to have been killed in Egypt. This was a diplomatic coup, but his son was not crown prince or Hittites would have been conquered thus. It was a deception, as far as truth is concerned; if the Hittites invaded the Delta, and Tut encountered them (later dying from injuries off battle) then this is different.
Either way, the Hittites lost a prince and Egypt her king.
M7, 2012.
Tut waged war against the border lands of Nubia and Syria. He is shown on his battle chest campaigning against Syrians and Nubians, and later is collecting tribute (war taxes or plunder) from them. If the Hittites killed him in battle, why did they not claim Egypt as their conquered vassal? Remember: if a king dies in battle, the country is conquered. This was the case in ancient times, as with the battles of Alexander the Great vs. Persian Empire, etc.
Queen Ankhesenamon sent letters to the Hittite King offering to be a bride to his sons, and make them King of Egypt; his son is sent and is presumed to have been killed in Egypt. This was a diplomatic coup, but his son was not crown prince or Hittites would have been conquered thus. It was a deception, as far as truth is concerned; if the Hittites invaded the Delta, and Tut encountered them (later dying from injuries off battle) then this is different.
Either way, the Hittites lost a prince and Egypt her king.
M7, 2012.
the burial of Akhnaton?
If Akhnaton was a "heretic" Pharaoh, with no accepted belief in Osiris the God of the Dead, then why build tombs and was he even mummified? If the people hated him, his burial was on the bottom of the Nile river, where most criminals are sent, and certainly not in KV55.
M7, 2012.
M7, 2012.
The true parents of King Nebkheperura Tutankhamon
Tut’s Parents:
Dr. Zahi Hawass said in his autopsy of Tut-ankh-Amon that “Tutankhamon’s parents are brother and sister.” He believed this meant “Akhnaton & an unknown female.” This was proven with DNA analysis. On Tut’s Restoration Stele, he claims his father is “Amonhotep 3.” Zahi said “father can mean Grandfather or predecessor.” In Ancient Egypt Incest was common among royalty, to “preserve the divine bloodlines,” via intermarriage. Had Queen/Pharaoh Hatshepsut not said her “father was Amon” her descendants would not have resulted to this for royal blood. I believe Tut’s parents are Sitamon & Smenkhkare. Both are “children of Amonhotep 3.” Sitamon was an “infant sister of Amonhotep 3” whom he married for political reasons, then married the commoner Tiye and made her his “Chief Royal Wife,” indicating other marriages. Amonhotep 3 was a teenager when he married Tiye while “hunting birds.” Tiye was fresh blood not tainted yet by incest. Sitamon was also the name of his Daughter. If Amonhotep had intercourse with his mother, then Sitamon was his “sister & daughter,” born before marriage to Tiye. Male Puberty is established by age 13. If his mother waited until that age, and did so for political reasons, then this is possible. The political reason was marriage to the eldest daughter of Pharaoh was required for future kings. There was no heir until he found Tiye and married her, escaping the situation with his mother. Sitamon means “Daughter of Amon.” Nicknames existed in Ancient Egypt.
Smenkhkare was believed to be a son of Amonhotep 3. The first born may have been Thutmose 5, but he either died young or was unfit to rule. His next in line was Amonhotep 4 (later as Akhnaton). When was Amonhotep 4 born? It would be after marriage to Tiye, so maybe early adulthood or later teen? Smenkhkare was born after him, so Sitamon would have waited for him to be pubescent before marriage. Amonhotep 3 ruled about 37 years. So this would be Sitamon’s age when his heir Amonhotep 4 became King; he ruled about 16 years. If Amonhotep 3 had a “co-regency” with his son due to poor health, would his heir need a queen for legitimacy? There is evidence of an illness besetting Egypt during the later portion of Amonhotep 3’s reign, and because he commissioned numerous Sakhmet statues built to offset the epidemic (Sakhmet was venerated to treat diseases). The mummy in KV55 was in his early to mid 20s, too young for Akhnaton and about the right age for Smenkhkara. The only reason people believed the mummy in KV55 was Akhnaton was due to the damage to the coffin it was found in; coincidentally many tombs were violated during the religious revolution following Akhnaton’s death. The revolution of 2011 CE in Egypt also had numerous tomb violations and grave-robbing, so this is nothing new.
How old was Smenkhkare when Akhnaton became King? He would have been born before Akhnaton became King, 16 + 2 = 18 (2 = the years Smenkhkare ruled approximately). So say Smenkhkare was a child when this happened, then Sitamon had intercourse with him to produce Tutankhaton. Tut was 9 when he was crowned; 9-2 = 7 (age when Akhenaton died), 16-7 = 9 (year 9 of Akhnaton reign). Tut was the son of a former Queen, who was essentially dethroned when Tiye became Chief Royal Wife, and so his mother wanted to be reinstated when she married Smenkhkara while Akhnaton was still in power. Zahi Hawass said in his book (Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharaohs, p. 145) that “Sitamon was the daughter of Amonhotep 3 and Tiye, and became queen later in his reign.” Perhaps if no one was supposed to know this, the information changed, though she was the right age for his daughter after Tiye was discovered and Sitamon was “adopted.” The name Sitamon appears as both a sister and daughter name of Amohotep 3’s family. Sitamon was an option for Tut’s mother (Zahi Hawass’s book, page 173), and his father was “most likely either Amonhotep 3 or Akhnaton.” Sitamon probably died before Tut became Pharaoh.
If Sitamon and Smenkhkare (S1) are Tut’s parents, then Tut is “son [in-law] of Amonhotep 3 via political marriage to Sitamon, Nephew of Amonhotep 3 because S1 had intercourse with his sister Sitamon, and grandson of A3 because Sitamon was also his/A3’s daughter [A3’s Daughter’s son].” Smenkhkare married Sitamon for protocol to become Pharaoh, then she died during Akhnaton’s reign and Smenkhkare married Meritaton (2nd daughter of Akhnaton). Tut inherited any genetic defects of this union. Incest in Egyptian Chronology is very confusing.
The Fall of Akhnaton:
Amonhotep 4 became Pharaoh after his father died of an illness. There may have been a co-regency prior to this, then Amonhotep 4 changed his name to Akhnaton. A4 continued the self-deification idea from his father. A3 (Nebmaa(t)-ra Amonhotep 3) once prayed to himself and was answered, so his people worshiped him as a god. They did not yet know that prayer is a psychic ability, and that anything can be used to focus one’s willpower, be it statues, a story, or a person. A3 introduced Science to his son A4, as with water evaporation. A4 took this religiously. He built open-ceiling temples to the Sun, so he could watch the Sun “drink its offerings.” The Sun was called the Aton, or Orb of Light (crown on Ra’s head). A3 made the new god “Aton-Ra”; “Ra” was his nickname. When “Ra” died all that was left was “Aton”, whose Chief Prophet was A4. So A4 changed his name, and the names of his people, to “Aton-friendly names.” In trying to convert people to this new concept, A4 closed all the other temples of the Gods, to focus attention to this discovery of a “real God” of real powers, that of solar powers not the lifeless statues in the temples. This action upset the people who did not know about Science. The roots to the Rosicrucian Order lay claim to this new Science of A4.
A4 (Akhnaton) married Nefertiti, a relative of his Advisor/Vizier, Aye. He was very much in love with her, and she bore him many daughters, but no surviving sons. Her sister later married Horemhab, but did not bear sons either. Her daughters never once bore a son. Why are sons important if royalty lies with the female? It is because Sons become Kings, and female Kings were not common then.
To reflect the “family motto” A4 once had intercourse with his mother Tiye, producing a daughter Bakhtaton. This is shown in a scene from a tomb where Nefertiti is dining with Akhnaton and Tiye is shown on the right panel, apparently losing her appetite and gives her food to Bakhtaton. A4 bestowed affection onto Tiye, after her husband A3 died, in the royal court of Akhetaton (Tell Al-Amarna). Bakhtaton was Tut’s “sister” (memory suggests she was blond-haired). After Nefertiti discovers this action, she divorced A4, as a threat to her being Great Royal Wife/Queen.
When Nefertiti divorced A4, something happened. A4 bestowed affection onto Smenkhkare, as found in some murals from there. A4 gives a new name to Smenkhkare, or Nefertiti’s former name (Nefer-Neferu-Aton), to prevent people from knowing about the divorce and to make them believe he was still married to Nefertiti. A4 later married his own daughters, Merit-Aton and later, when that didn’t work, to Ankhesnpaaton (Ankhesnamon), whom he had a daughter, Ankhesenpaaton Tasheri. A4 adopted Tut as “his bodily son” and heir. He wanted Tut to carry on the work of the Monotheist Faction in Egypt.
The failure of Science taking root in Egypt and A4’s refusal to back down caused a revolution and disorder in Egypt. This caused riots there due to high unemployment, religious upheaval, and economic factors relating to grain storage at the now-closed temples. The economy of Egypt was farming, and all the resources were now directed to Akhetaton and the Temples of Aton. Tombs were plundered as a result, as were old temples. Civil unrest was popular.
Smenkhkare inherited Egypt after A4 died of some illness, or was murdered. Smenkhkare tried to build a temple of Amon, the main God prior to Aton worship. He was probably murdered too, because (memory) his tomb was violated when Tut was Pharaoh. Items from this tomb were recycled for Tutankhamon’s use in KV62.
When Tutankhaton became Pharaoh, the world was quiet for some time, expecting change. He was only 9 years of age then. His Viziers (Aye was one of them) held the peace while Tut was being educated. This period lasted some 3 years before a decision was reached. Aton had to go. To prevent his own untimely demise, Tut ordered Polytheism to be the official religion once more. Aton was still worshiped, but only in the City of Aton, which was abandoned by Tut as he moved to the northern city of Mennofer (Memphis), and later to Thebes (Waset). He changed his “Aton-friendly names” back to their original Polytheist names. And he reopened the Temples, filled them with treasures to attract the Gods back to Egypt, wrote laws, and maintained Egypt’s borders with small raids into Northern Syria and Southern Nubia (as found in the tomb of his Viceroy, Huy).
Copyright 2011 Michael J. Costa, All rights reserved.
M7, 2012.
Dr. Zahi Hawass said in his autopsy of Tut-ankh-Amon that “Tutankhamon’s parents are brother and sister.” He believed this meant “Akhnaton & an unknown female.” This was proven with DNA analysis. On Tut’s Restoration Stele, he claims his father is “Amonhotep 3.” Zahi said “father can mean Grandfather or predecessor.” In Ancient Egypt Incest was common among royalty, to “preserve the divine bloodlines,” via intermarriage. Had Queen/Pharaoh Hatshepsut not said her “father was Amon” her descendants would not have resulted to this for royal blood. I believe Tut’s parents are Sitamon & Smenkhkare. Both are “children of Amonhotep 3.” Sitamon was an “infant sister of Amonhotep 3” whom he married for political reasons, then married the commoner Tiye and made her his “Chief Royal Wife,” indicating other marriages. Amonhotep 3 was a teenager when he married Tiye while “hunting birds.” Tiye was fresh blood not tainted yet by incest. Sitamon was also the name of his Daughter. If Amonhotep had intercourse with his mother, then Sitamon was his “sister & daughter,” born before marriage to Tiye. Male Puberty is established by age 13. If his mother waited until that age, and did so for political reasons, then this is possible. The political reason was marriage to the eldest daughter of Pharaoh was required for future kings. There was no heir until he found Tiye and married her, escaping the situation with his mother. Sitamon means “Daughter of Amon.” Nicknames existed in Ancient Egypt.
Smenkhkare was believed to be a son of Amonhotep 3. The first born may have been Thutmose 5, but he either died young or was unfit to rule. His next in line was Amonhotep 4 (later as Akhnaton). When was Amonhotep 4 born? It would be after marriage to Tiye, so maybe early adulthood or later teen? Smenkhkare was born after him, so Sitamon would have waited for him to be pubescent before marriage. Amonhotep 3 ruled about 37 years. So this would be Sitamon’s age when his heir Amonhotep 4 became King; he ruled about 16 years. If Amonhotep 3 had a “co-regency” with his son due to poor health, would his heir need a queen for legitimacy? There is evidence of an illness besetting Egypt during the later portion of Amonhotep 3’s reign, and because he commissioned numerous Sakhmet statues built to offset the epidemic (Sakhmet was venerated to treat diseases). The mummy in KV55 was in his early to mid 20s, too young for Akhnaton and about the right age for Smenkhkara. The only reason people believed the mummy in KV55 was Akhnaton was due to the damage to the coffin it was found in; coincidentally many tombs were violated during the religious revolution following Akhnaton’s death. The revolution of 2011 CE in Egypt also had numerous tomb violations and grave-robbing, so this is nothing new.
How old was Smenkhkare when Akhnaton became King? He would have been born before Akhnaton became King, 16 + 2 = 18 (2 = the years Smenkhkare ruled approximately). So say Smenkhkare was a child when this happened, then Sitamon had intercourse with him to produce Tutankhaton. Tut was 9 when he was crowned; 9-2 = 7 (age when Akhenaton died), 16-7 = 9 (year 9 of Akhnaton reign). Tut was the son of a former Queen, who was essentially dethroned when Tiye became Chief Royal Wife, and so his mother wanted to be reinstated when she married Smenkhkara while Akhnaton was still in power. Zahi Hawass said in his book (Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharaohs, p. 145) that “Sitamon was the daughter of Amonhotep 3 and Tiye, and became queen later in his reign.” Perhaps if no one was supposed to know this, the information changed, though she was the right age for his daughter after Tiye was discovered and Sitamon was “adopted.” The name Sitamon appears as both a sister and daughter name of Amohotep 3’s family. Sitamon was an option for Tut’s mother (Zahi Hawass’s book, page 173), and his father was “most likely either Amonhotep 3 or Akhnaton.” Sitamon probably died before Tut became Pharaoh.
If Sitamon and Smenkhkare (S1) are Tut’s parents, then Tut is “son [in-law] of Amonhotep 3 via political marriage to Sitamon, Nephew of Amonhotep 3 because S1 had intercourse with his sister Sitamon, and grandson of A3 because Sitamon was also his/A3’s daughter [A3’s Daughter’s son].” Smenkhkare married Sitamon for protocol to become Pharaoh, then she died during Akhnaton’s reign and Smenkhkare married Meritaton (2nd daughter of Akhnaton). Tut inherited any genetic defects of this union. Incest in Egyptian Chronology is very confusing.
The Fall of Akhnaton:
Amonhotep 4 became Pharaoh after his father died of an illness. There may have been a co-regency prior to this, then Amonhotep 4 changed his name to Akhnaton. A4 continued the self-deification idea from his father. A3 (Nebmaa(t)-ra Amonhotep 3) once prayed to himself and was answered, so his people worshiped him as a god. They did not yet know that prayer is a psychic ability, and that anything can be used to focus one’s willpower, be it statues, a story, or a person. A3 introduced Science to his son A4, as with water evaporation. A4 took this religiously. He built open-ceiling temples to the Sun, so he could watch the Sun “drink its offerings.” The Sun was called the Aton, or Orb of Light (crown on Ra’s head). A3 made the new god “Aton-Ra”; “Ra” was his nickname. When “Ra” died all that was left was “Aton”, whose Chief Prophet was A4. So A4 changed his name, and the names of his people, to “Aton-friendly names.” In trying to convert people to this new concept, A4 closed all the other temples of the Gods, to focus attention to this discovery of a “real God” of real powers, that of solar powers not the lifeless statues in the temples. This action upset the people who did not know about Science. The roots to the Rosicrucian Order lay claim to this new Science of A4.
A4 (Akhnaton) married Nefertiti, a relative of his Advisor/Vizier, Aye. He was very much in love with her, and she bore him many daughters, but no surviving sons. Her sister later married Horemhab, but did not bear sons either. Her daughters never once bore a son. Why are sons important if royalty lies with the female? It is because Sons become Kings, and female Kings were not common then.
To reflect the “family motto” A4 once had intercourse with his mother Tiye, producing a daughter Bakhtaton. This is shown in a scene from a tomb where Nefertiti is dining with Akhnaton and Tiye is shown on the right panel, apparently losing her appetite and gives her food to Bakhtaton. A4 bestowed affection onto Tiye, after her husband A3 died, in the royal court of Akhetaton (Tell Al-Amarna). Bakhtaton was Tut’s “sister” (memory suggests she was blond-haired). After Nefertiti discovers this action, she divorced A4, as a threat to her being Great Royal Wife/Queen.
When Nefertiti divorced A4, something happened. A4 bestowed affection onto Smenkhkare, as found in some murals from there. A4 gives a new name to Smenkhkare, or Nefertiti’s former name (Nefer-Neferu-Aton), to prevent people from knowing about the divorce and to make them believe he was still married to Nefertiti. A4 later married his own daughters, Merit-Aton and later, when that didn’t work, to Ankhesnpaaton (Ankhesnamon), whom he had a daughter, Ankhesenpaaton Tasheri. A4 adopted Tut as “his bodily son” and heir. He wanted Tut to carry on the work of the Monotheist Faction in Egypt.
The failure of Science taking root in Egypt and A4’s refusal to back down caused a revolution and disorder in Egypt. This caused riots there due to high unemployment, religious upheaval, and economic factors relating to grain storage at the now-closed temples. The economy of Egypt was farming, and all the resources were now directed to Akhetaton and the Temples of Aton. Tombs were plundered as a result, as were old temples. Civil unrest was popular.
Smenkhkare inherited Egypt after A4 died of some illness, or was murdered. Smenkhkare tried to build a temple of Amon, the main God prior to Aton worship. He was probably murdered too, because (memory) his tomb was violated when Tut was Pharaoh. Items from this tomb were recycled for Tutankhamon’s use in KV62.
When Tutankhaton became Pharaoh, the world was quiet for some time, expecting change. He was only 9 years of age then. His Viziers (Aye was one of them) held the peace while Tut was being educated. This period lasted some 3 years before a decision was reached. Aton had to go. To prevent his own untimely demise, Tut ordered Polytheism to be the official religion once more. Aton was still worshiped, but only in the City of Aton, which was abandoned by Tut as he moved to the northern city of Mennofer (Memphis), and later to Thebes (Waset). He changed his “Aton-friendly names” back to their original Polytheist names. And he reopened the Temples, filled them with treasures to attract the Gods back to Egypt, wrote laws, and maintained Egypt’s borders with small raids into Northern Syria and Southern Nubia (as found in the tomb of his Viceroy, Huy).
Copyright 2011 Michael J. Costa, All rights reserved.
M7, 2012.
Thursday, January 5, 2012
how to make the King Tut mask
The death mask of Tutankhamon was made by:
1. Place a wet panel of cloth over the living face of the Pharaoh.
2. Pour liquid plaster over the cloth, with holes for breathing (at the nose).
3. This is called "cartonnage."
4. When the plaster dries, remove molded cloth from face.
5. Work semi-liquid gold into or onto the plaster mold, and work on the image as the gold hardens.
6. Either keep or remove the Cartonnage plaster/cloth mold from the golden mask. Some Late Period masks contained the gold still attached to the plaster.
7. Fill in the remaining spaces of the gold mask with more gold, or add silver or copper to the gold to strengthen it (white gold has silver in it, and red gold has copper; pure gold is very soft as a metal, and will break when dropped; 24k).
The face of Tut on the mask = is his actual face, preserved forever.
M7, 2012.
1. Place a wet panel of cloth over the living face of the Pharaoh.
2. Pour liquid plaster over the cloth, with holes for breathing (at the nose).
3. This is called "cartonnage."
4. When the plaster dries, remove molded cloth from face.
5. Work semi-liquid gold into or onto the plaster mold, and work on the image as the gold hardens.
6. Either keep or remove the Cartonnage plaster/cloth mold from the golden mask. Some Late Period masks contained the gold still attached to the plaster.
7. Fill in the remaining spaces of the gold mask with more gold, or add silver or copper to the gold to strengthen it (white gold has silver in it, and red gold has copper; pure gold is very soft as a metal, and will break when dropped; 24k).
The face of Tut on the mask = is his actual face, preserved forever.
M7, 2012.
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
What the Curse of Tutankhamon really is
What the Curse of Tutankhamon really is © Copyright 2012 MJC
Curses are the modern terminology for supernatural (Superphysical) radiation. Negative radiation occurs from the premature demise of someone close to the source of the power; like a family member. Resentment of this action permeates and strengthens the radiation of the power source; like guilty feelings about what happened to the victim. The radiation may spread whenever someone activates it, as with mentioning names of the soul who was first affected, as calling names awakens the soul and this radiated memory.
The “Curse of King Tut” started when the tomb was opened and his names were first translated. Then it spread to the USA in Tutankhamon’s future incarnation as President John Kennedy, which occurred in Kennedy’s childhood rather than at birth. The soul of Tutankhamon entered the young Jack Kennedy and assumed control as his higher self. When Kennedy and his sister Kate were discussing “should his elder brother not return home from the War, (Jack) could be President of USA,” this action caused the elder Kennedy sibling to be “shot down over the ocean” from his airplane. He was the first Kennedy to die in this sequence. Even though the later assassination of Kennedy in 1963 was mostly “scripted in Time” – as by comparison to Pres. Lincoln – the “Kennedy Family Curse” continues to this day. That would not have occurred if Tutankhamon was not discovered in 1922.
Guilt trips have been found in my book, Eye of the Pharaoh ©1990, between Tut and his wife’s (stillborn) children. Though Tut may not have been responsible for it, he blamed himself and thus strengthened the field of radiation of resentment for what could have been an heir to his throne. And this would be a reason for why people are said to “cry when entering his tomb” for no explicable answer.
The term “curse” is what the Arabs used because of their lack of understanding with regard to magic, the occult, and the supernatural.
© MC 2012
Curses are the modern terminology for supernatural (Superphysical) radiation. Negative radiation occurs from the premature demise of someone close to the source of the power; like a family member. Resentment of this action permeates and strengthens the radiation of the power source; like guilty feelings about what happened to the victim. The radiation may spread whenever someone activates it, as with mentioning names of the soul who was first affected, as calling names awakens the soul and this radiated memory.
The “Curse of King Tut” started when the tomb was opened and his names were first translated. Then it spread to the USA in Tutankhamon’s future incarnation as President John Kennedy, which occurred in Kennedy’s childhood rather than at birth. The soul of Tutankhamon entered the young Jack Kennedy and assumed control as his higher self. When Kennedy and his sister Kate were discussing “should his elder brother not return home from the War, (Jack) could be President of USA,” this action caused the elder Kennedy sibling to be “shot down over the ocean” from his airplane. He was the first Kennedy to die in this sequence. Even though the later assassination of Kennedy in 1963 was mostly “scripted in Time” – as by comparison to Pres. Lincoln – the “Kennedy Family Curse” continues to this day. That would not have occurred if Tutankhamon was not discovered in 1922.
Guilt trips have been found in my book, Eye of the Pharaoh ©1990, between Tut and his wife’s (stillborn) children. Though Tut may not have been responsible for it, he blamed himself and thus strengthened the field of radiation of resentment for what could have been an heir to his throne. And this would be a reason for why people are said to “cry when entering his tomb” for no explicable answer.
The term “curse” is what the Arabs used because of their lack of understanding with regard to magic, the occult, and the supernatural.
© MC 2012
Monday, January 2, 2012
Tut loved Ankh not necessarily Life.... Word Puns in Ancient Egypt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pun
Word Puns in Ancient Egypt
On the Lotus chalice, it reads that "Tutankhamon loves life," when in actuality the reference is to his wife's name, Ankh-esnamon, who was his "water lily flower." I would not think that someone whose very image can kill people would "love life," as the supernatural element surrounding him attests to.
People then made the error that "all ancient Egyptians loved life" based on the Lotus Chalice inscription. They [A.E.] realized that life or livelihood continued after Earth and in another form, and they prepared for it, as found among out-of-body experiences and astral travel to Duat / the Otherworld. Ancestor worship and belief in an afterlife strengthened their bond to the spirit realm. Spiritual knowledge surpassed physical science in those times. Pictures of the soul hovering over the body are found in tombs, mummy cases, and funerary papyri.
Word Puns are words with multiple meanings. The Ankh mirror case is one, as are words overused and rather than create a new word, the same word is given a different meaning. Blame lazy scribes.
M7, 2011.
Psychic Warfare in Ancient Egypt: Tomb Contents of KV62
Psychic Warfare in Ancient Egypt: Tomb Contents of KV62
© Copyright 2012 Michael J. Costa, All rights reserved.
Most of the contents found in KV62, of military content, had “magical effects” to them. One silver trumpet (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13092827 ) would influence modern military activity when used, as with WW2, 1967 Israeli Conflict, 1991 Iraq, and in January 2011 when it was stolen from the Cairo Museum during the “Arab Spring” revolution.
“As Tutankhamun's trumpet echoes once more, the loss - and return - of such a celebrated artefact is convincing some of Tutankhamun's celebrated curse. Not least the trumpet's apparent ability to summon up war.
Bandsman Tappern had, after all, played the trumpet shortly before World War II broke out. Cairo Museum's Tutankhamun curator claims the trumpet retains "magical powers" and was blown before the first Gulf War, and by a member of staff the week before the Egyptian uprising.”
His Gold and Iron Daggers
(https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPqSav6WtL5IMJQD56MnlDU6G9_Vic3IWr3DlKU9e728PhfOKF_vQ7N2XhNnhBhrgwY6lWO5f8atL1kg-v31JXqr05c-T3V2p9rUammp_mqhIutzwVjsN1t6kdr6eQkEaeUdbALVWB_qU/s1600/king_tut_treasures_09.jpg )
found on his mummy, may be made for the afterlife rather than used by him. Anything made of gold is impractical because it is a soft metal with no sharpened edges. Iron was seen as magical because most ancient iron came from meteors, and the myth that the floor of Heaven was made of iron comes from this fact (People believed parts of the floor of Heaven broke free and fell to Earth as meteoric iron). Only the best was made for the tomb to last forever with his justified soul; it was a drag that Tutankhamon could not use these items in life when they are meant for the afterlife. Some iron tools show wear or rust; rust was seen as magical, the “blood of Typhon.”
Tut’s shields and walking staves had images of enemies on them. This was a technique of Visualization, a form of mental magic, whereby one uses the mind to influence one’s environment, via willed Chronokinetic focus. The shields displayed him as conquering his enemies, as a sphinx trampling them under his paws. Also his footstool does this as do his sandals, to cause pressure onto his enemies’ heads (as I replicated in modern times using Egyptian counter magic/Psychic Warfare techniques that really do work on some people). Holding the walking staves, his hand on his enemies’ bodies, held them in check so they could not attack Egypt. These were probably used in life, as Tut had a clubbed foot.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/arts/frontrow/media/Tut_shield.jpg
http://kingtutmelbourne.com.au/gallery_whowashe/images/whowashe1.jpg
http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b7e57330db60.jpg
http://my.greasy.com/host/images/10835938.jpg
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/198772_10150732929935467_399061025466_19965085_2963380_n.jpg
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCOD83HBODHT46LQ3SygDLkLPckv0clsu4bl96AppGfvQeyzWfx99cnRurcmK63NbN2FJfTZKvS0YU0s0kQSYvWvNd3ZRi5CPtUOBuiiQiAWbjXh_91IIHIMPn80BSS1S9Io9FpZKqfVKI/s320/tutshoes.jpeg
http://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/281345_10150732943390467_399061025466_19965248_6239141_a.jpg
M7, 2012
© Copyright 2012 Michael J. Costa, All rights reserved.
Most of the contents found in KV62, of military content, had “magical effects” to them. One silver trumpet (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13092827 ) would influence modern military activity when used, as with WW2, 1967 Israeli Conflict, 1991 Iraq, and in January 2011 when it was stolen from the Cairo Museum during the “Arab Spring” revolution.
“As Tutankhamun's trumpet echoes once more, the loss - and return - of such a celebrated artefact is convincing some of Tutankhamun's celebrated curse. Not least the trumpet's apparent ability to summon up war.
Bandsman Tappern had, after all, played the trumpet shortly before World War II broke out. Cairo Museum's Tutankhamun curator claims the trumpet retains "magical powers" and was blown before the first Gulf War, and by a member of staff the week before the Egyptian uprising.”
His Gold and Iron Daggers
(https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPqSav6WtL5IMJQD56MnlDU6G9_Vic3IWr3DlKU9e728PhfOKF_vQ7N2XhNnhBhrgwY6lWO5f8atL1kg-v31JXqr05c-T3V2p9rUammp_mqhIutzwVjsN1t6kdr6eQkEaeUdbALVWB_qU/s1600/king_tut_treasures_09.jpg )
found on his mummy, may be made for the afterlife rather than used by him. Anything made of gold is impractical because it is a soft metal with no sharpened edges. Iron was seen as magical because most ancient iron came from meteors, and the myth that the floor of Heaven was made of iron comes from this fact (People believed parts of the floor of Heaven broke free and fell to Earth as meteoric iron). Only the best was made for the tomb to last forever with his justified soul; it was a drag that Tutankhamon could not use these items in life when they are meant for the afterlife. Some iron tools show wear or rust; rust was seen as magical, the “blood of Typhon.”
Tut’s shields and walking staves had images of enemies on them. This was a technique of Visualization, a form of mental magic, whereby one uses the mind to influence one’s environment, via willed Chronokinetic focus. The shields displayed him as conquering his enemies, as a sphinx trampling them under his paws. Also his footstool does this as do his sandals, to cause pressure onto his enemies’ heads (as I replicated in modern times using Egyptian counter magic/Psychic Warfare techniques that really do work on some people). Holding the walking staves, his hand on his enemies’ bodies, held them in check so they could not attack Egypt. These were probably used in life, as Tut had a clubbed foot.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/arts/frontrow/media/Tut_shield.jpg
http://kingtutmelbourne.com.au/gallery_whowashe/images/whowashe1.jpg
http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b7e57330db60.jpg
http://my.greasy.com/host/images/10835938.jpg
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/198772_10150732929935467_399061025466_19965085_2963380_n.jpg
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCOD83HBODHT46LQ3SygDLkLPckv0clsu4bl96AppGfvQeyzWfx99cnRurcmK63NbN2FJfTZKvS0YU0s0kQSYvWvNd3ZRi5CPtUOBuiiQiAWbjXh_91IIHIMPn80BSS1S9Io9FpZKqfVKI/s320/tutshoes.jpeg
http://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/281345_10150732943390467_399061025466_19965248_6239141_a.jpg
M7, 2012
An Estimate of value
In the early 1990s, copies of my novel (Eye of the Pharaoh) started circulating in California, USA. If one million copies were first sold before I alerted the public about its theft in 1994, then afterwards people copied it into 1,000 copies each and then sold each copy for $1,000 each, then you have one billion copies in the trillions of USD. The book was said to be for sale at $17 each in 1993, and by 1996 it was on the international black market, ranging from $1500 to $50,000 each. The NSA knew about this or they would not have censored it after 9-11-2001 via the Patriot Act excuse. It found its way to the BM after false reports of my / the author's demise rumor; the rumor was intentional to acquire a confession from the thief. I am not deceased. The world owes me in the "tens of trillions of USD" from the illicit sales of my book, which was registered in the Library of Congress after I discovered it was being distributed by my trusted therapist after I let her borrow it for one week in 1991. The LOC (C) Copyright was in Dec. 1995 before it hit the BM, under the other name "The Flawed Emerald" later published by 1stbooks Library / Authorhouse around 2001 CE.
This book was well known by 1998 CE. The Media in CA especially knew of its existence, as did political cartoonists in Newsweek and other news sources.
M7C, 2012.
This book was well known by 1998 CE. The Media in CA especially knew of its existence, as did political cartoonists in Newsweek and other news sources.
M7C, 2012.
mysterious artifact
The Mysterious Artifact of Nebkheperura
© Copyright 2012 M7C, All rights reserved.
This artifact (see picture) has the royal name of Nebkheperura on it flanked by solar-crowned animals in mummiform. Nearly everyone I shown the artifact to (on facebook.com) said it was “fake” or “forged in modern times,” because of its crude rendering. I had purchased it from Sadigh Gallery Ancient Art, Inc., in NY, USA. In 2009 people conducted a campaign of Libel against this company, but not before 2008 do any allegations of fraud appear online. In 2009 Dr. Zahi Hawass, then President of the Supreme Council of Antiquities of Egypt (under Pres. Mubarak), demanded “the return of all Egyptian monuments and illegally smuggled artifacts back to Egypt.” The 2009 Libel campaign also targeted books of Egyptian History and Culture on Amazon.com, including books I authored and one of my College History Professors (my books were not sold then, so the libel was false and based on my description of the book only).
When I purchased the artifact, there were violent storms in NY which “followed it here” causing a storm until the day I opened the package. Whenever I examine the artifact (removed from its storage box) there are weather anomalies; today it is overcast (cloudy). The silver trumpet of Nebkheperura in the Cairo Museum “causes battles or wars to commence when blown into,” as discovered by Museum Staff once in 1967, 1991 and in January 2011. I cleaned the artifact with ordinary water (it is made of “brown limestone”) to see if any paint was there; nothing resulted. The reverse side has tiny cracks in it. The Cartouche (oval for name) has a “crude looking scarab” that was created by a low quality craftsman. SG sells “low end/quality artifacts” mostly, as they admitted to in their catalogs. I emailed them on January 2, 2012 to ask about the origin of their artifacts, after facebook.com people (the Hatshepsut Project) claimed “Sadigh Gallery are notorious purveyors of fake artifacts.” Michael Sadigh himself telephoned me personally to state his artifacts “are real, and come from different collections, always changing hands so that the origins are unknown” (other than culture). The libelous claims against his company are recent and come from either internet trolls or competition, as some have links to “more respectable dealers of artifacts.” Not one lawsuit was filed against SG. Artifacts were refunded by people who believe this libelous claim movement. It is like returning lava rock to Hawaii because a Native Hawaiian claims it is “unlucky”, or that certain corporations are criminal so as to attack their stock value on the NYSE. Malicious people misuse the Internet to attack reputation and thus businesses. They are liars.
Human craftsmen in ancient times did not always create the best artifacts as found in Museums. Most Museums only admit the best quality items for display, as this brings in the most admirers; all others remain in private collections or on the market. Shoddy works may appear in low-end dealers, but that does Not mean said items are fakes. Most mummies found in Egypt were from commoners; and their items are not fit for the King of Egypt. I compared the “crude scarab” in the name to other pictures of books on Nebkheperura and found there are mostly different from each other, meaning, the scarabs in some renderings of his name are found on this piece. This piece was probably in someone else’s burial, as with someone using the name for “protection” as an amulet. There is a loop in the top for wearing as an amulet, and the edges are ridged like a modern coin.
© M7C 2012.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)